As part of our regular “We Are!” feature, we recognize 20 Penn Staters who have gone above and beyond what’s asked of them in their work at the University.
Administrator
All tenured faculty in the College of Earth and Mineral Sciences.
Tenured faculty will participate in a performance evaluation once every five years. The tenured faculty performance evaluation (TFPE) is intended to recognize accomplishments and foster future plans of tenured faculty members who are contributing to the mission of the college and University and, in rare cases, to provide guidance to those not contributing meaningfully to the well-being of the college or University. The goal of the evaluation is as much to promote future planning as to review past progress. In particular, the TFPE is designed to encourage and assist those aspiring to increased impact or further excellence.
TFPEs for tenured faculty members are a method for assisting and supporting faculty members to maintain vigorous contributions to teaching, research, and service throughout their careers. A substantive discussion of the faculty member’s readiness for promotion, where applicable, must accompany the review.
The five-year interval will begin on January 1 after the year of hire or January 1 of the year after the most recent promotion decision, whichever is most recent (exceptions to this schedule for individual faculty members require approval by the dean). See also the section titled ‘Leave Policy’ below.
The five-year reviews must involve a meeting with the department head, and, upon the request of the faculty member, the dean.
The primary responsibility of each member of the EMS tenure-line faculty is to contribute to the achievements of the University and the college in fostering the intellectual growth and progress of students, in advancing knowledge and understanding, and in serving society. To meet this responsibility, each member of the faculty must maintain and demonstrate a deep and career-long commitment to improving both personal and college capabilities in teaching, research, and service. It is recognized that the characteristics of the contributions and the balance between them may change as career proceeds.
To enhance the strength of the college and to further the objective of maintaining vitality in teaching, research, and service throughout an academic career, the members of the EMS tenure-line faculty accept and welcome increasing responsibility for the success of the college through a variety of activities, such as:
For tenured faculty undergoing their first FPE five years after receiving tenure, adherence to the Guidelines for the Consideration of Promotion of Tenure-Line Associate Professors fulfills this requirement.
For subsequent reviews, the TFPE process is intended to provide an opportunity to review and acknowledge past achievements, and particularly to provide an opportunity for planning future activities. To help achieve these objectives, the EMS faculty member will be notified two semesters in advance of the upcoming review. Late in the fall semester, the dean will send a letter to the faculty member requesting the submission of the following to the department head’s assistant as Microsoft Word documents:
The Dean’s request to the faculty member will include a request to the department head or department head’s assistant to provide the following:
The Dean’s request to the faculty member will include a request to the college’s business administrator to provide the faculty member, copying the department head’s assistant, with the following (once the current fall semester data are finalized):
Following receipt of items 1-8 above, the department head’s assistant will assemble the documents into a single document in the order listed above and send the compiled document to the faculty member for final review. Once approved by the faculty member, the department head’s assistant will send the document to the department head on or before January 15.
The department head will write a review of the faculty member’s performance and future plans. The document, along with the department head’s letter, will then be submitted by the department head to the college’s business administrator on or before January 30. Outside letters will not be solicited nor considered as part of the review.
The College TFPE Committee will review the materials (except the department head’s letter – this will be removed from the materials to allow the TFPE Committee to make a judgement independent of the department head’s assessment) and prepare a written summary and assessment following this standard review process:
The TFPE committee’s statement should reflect both the consensus and the breadth of opinion within the committee. Written comments of the TFPE committee should focus on accomplishment and future goals in accordance with college expectations. The evaluation should include a realistic appraisal of the candidate’s ability to achieve the proposed goals. The TFPE committee can include recommendations for action in support of a faculty member’s career goals. The file and accompanying letter will be sent to the college’s business administrator who will forward it to the dean. The dean will receive the department head’s letter separately.
Faculty members may request to meet with the TFPE committee as part of the evaluation. Such requests should be made through the Dean’s Office in late January, after the department head has prepared their review. The TFPE committee may request a meeting with a faculty member to discuss the evaluation. After the review is submitted to the dean, the TFPE committee may request a meeting with the dean to discuss a given case. The dean may also consult with either or both department head and/or the TFPE committee prior to finalizing their letter.
When a faculty member’s approved leave (e.g., full year sabbatical, full year of leave) defers their five-year evaluation, the accomplishments and materials produced during the approved leave year are to be included in the next five-year review. In such instances, that review would include materials for the past six years, consistent in principle with the pre-tenure process and the subsequent review would be undertaken five years from the new date. As in any case, the evaluation will focus on quality and quantity of scholarly products – not time since degree, hire, or previous promotion.
One tenured faculty member from each department of the college will be assigned to the TFPE committee. The faculty of each department (tenured and tenure-track) will establish and adopt its own protocols for identifying its representative to the college TFPE committee. If a member of the TFPE committee is scheduled for a performance evaluation, the committee will convene without that member present to perform the evaluation. Tenured associate professors and professors may serve on this committee. However, there should never be more than two associate professors on the committee. If more than two departments nominate associate professors to serve, then the decision about which two departments may have associate professors on this committee will be decided by drawing lots and the unsuccessful departments will be asked to nominate professors instead. The committee chair may be either a professor or associate professor, as determined by TFPE committee vote. Committee members at the associate professor rank must recuse themselves from evaluating candidates at a higher rank.
The department head will conclude the evaluation by meeting with the faculty member and discussing the written evaluations. At the faculty member’s request, they may also meet with the dean. A copy of the written evaluations of the TFPE committee and the department head will be provided to the faculty member at the conclusion of the evaluation.
The first five-year review following tenure will follow the Guidelines for the Consideration of Promotion of Tenure-Line Associate Professors. In subsequent five-year reviews the department head will reserve time to meet with each faculty member to discuss the review. If requested by the faculty member or dean, a meeting will be arranged with the faculty member and the dean to discuss the evaluation. A summary of the meeting will be shared in writing to the faculty member’s department head.
The dean, in conjunction with the department head, will be responsible for initiating action, if any, in response to the evaluation. If improvements in performance are recommended, the faculty member and the faculty member’s department head will prepare an appropriate response, the implementation of which should be monitored by the department head. The dean will be notified of the effectiveness of a plan to improve and enhance a faculty member’s performance on a two- and four-year interval. Finally, a clear link must be established between the performance review and faculty rewards.
For the vast majority of faculty who are effectively carrying out the college mission, the TFPE committee should make recommendations as to the appropriate recognition that could further enhance the quality of a faculty member’s work. The evaluation process may also identify faculty who need redirection or revitalization. In these cases, a development plan should be formulated to help the faculty member improve their academic contribution. If appropriate, such faculty development plans will be accompanied by institutional resources and assistance necessary for their successful implementation. The dean will discuss the results of the evaluation and, if appropriate, recommend a plan of professional development. Any such development plan should be constructive in nature, and again, if appropriate, supported by institutional resources for implementation. In cases where a plan is developed, follow-through to ensure its implementation is required. At two- and four-year intervals, the dean will review the progress of the development plan and, if necessary, adjust the approach.
Late in the fall semester of the faculty member’s fifth year (five years since the first five-year review of an associate professor or the last TFPE) the faculty member will be notified by the Dean’s Office that they will be up for TFPE review in the spring and will be instructed to begin assembling their documents.
NOTE: The performance of all faculty members, regardless of rank, will normally be evaluated ten years after the award of tenure in the college and every five years thereafter, unless the faculty member underwent the promotion to professor process, in which case the next review will be five years after the completion of that process, whether or not promotion to professor was awarded. A TFPE review will not be required if the faculty member is on a phased retirement plan or has a confirmed departure date from Penn State that is within the next 12 months. A TFPE review will also not be required if the faculty is undergoing a promotion to professor review in the same semester as the TFPE packet is due.
Policy AC40 Annual Evaluation of Faculty Performance (Formerly HR40): https://policy.psu.edu/policies/ac40
See also AC13 Procedure for Hiring Full-Time Faculty: https://policy.psu.edu/policies/ac13
These guidelines are designed to assist EMS departments that are recruiting tenure-line faculty. Our desire is to have collegial, open searches that aggressively identify and seek a diversity of excellent candidates to appoint outstanding new faculty. Thus, searches are a vital part of maintaining the college’s excellence.
The search process begins when the department head requests permission from the dean to conduct a search. If approved by the dean, they will authorize a search in a particular field or fields and at a specific rank, or as an open search. The job ad is then reviewed by the HR Consultant who works with the Dean for final approval. After approval, the HR Consultant works with the department to submit the job requisition in Workday. Talent Acquisition posts the ad on Penn State’s Career Page and submits the request for external advertising sites. The final advertisement is sent to the department for approval.
The search committee, in consultation with the department head, normally prepares the job description. Recruiting guidelines will be made available to the search committee. Advertising in national venues is required for all standing (permanent) appointments. The ad should clearly indicate the nature of the duties to be performed (and for every rank listed if it is an open rank search) and the background of education and experience sought. Ordinarily, it will list a set of minimum essential qualifications and expectations of the position. If considering faculty members who require visa sponsorship, work closely with EMS HR and Global on required items in job posting. The position description should also discuss expectations for the position in supporting and fostering department and EMS priorities. Additionally, a statement along the lines of “Please note: Applicant materials may be shared beyond the search committee.”
The complete approved ad from Talent Acquisition must be used for all position announcements (advertisements, list-servs, e-mails, etc.). All jobs must be posted for at least 30 days so that if an international candidate is selected, we meet those requirements for sponsorship. Offers cannot be made until the 31st day.
The department head normally appoints the search committee. The committee must have a minimum of five members. No fewer than half of the members on a search committee will be faculty members of the academic unit in which the new faculty member will be appointed, or those who hold joint appointments with the academic unit. All search committees should represent a broad range within the members.
Department heads play a key role in any search. They must stay in touch with the search committee chair and help in motivating departmental faculty to provide names of appropriate candidates. The head will lead the department discussion of candidates brought forward by the search committee and will then make a recommendation to the dean about who should be invited for a campus visit. The department head will discuss with the search committee chair any departmental goals and assist where needed. The department head will ensure that the search chair attends/reviews the Faculty Search Training (when available) along with the committee members; shares and discusses the HR search information with the committee; and invites the Associate Dean for Educational Equity (or their delegate) to meet with the committee; all prior to completing and posting the job description.
Search committee chairs are expected to take the lead in contacting potential candidates, keeping the department head informed about the progress of the search and communicating with other departmental faculty about the search.
The Chair must ensure that each search committee member reviews the University’s Faculty Search Training prior to developing the job description for the job posting.
The chair of the committee or department head appoints a staff person (typically, they are given the Manager Recruiting Support (MRS) role in Workday) in the unit to be responsible for the coordination of the advertising process and the search. Workday Recruiting must be used for all searches. The MRS or our Talent Acquisition Recruiter gives the chair and members of the search committee access to the search in Workday and monitors, verifies, acknowledges, and maintains materials submitted by applicants. At the direction of the department head or search committee chair, the MRS may also be responsible for scheduling search committee meetings and drafting correspondence regarding applicants for the chair's signature. At the discretion of the department, certain application materials may also be made available to other members of the faculty (and staff and/or postdoctoral scholars) for them to provide input to the search committee (please see breakout of recommended items below). These faculty members should be reminded that application materials are to be treated with confidentiality and discussed at the department level only. Faculty members must not be in contact with applicants or colleagues of applicants.
See SHARING OF APPLICANT MATERIALS below for EMS standards regarding the sharing of candidate materials.
Use of Workday Recruiting is required to ensure that applicants receive the required disclosure statements at the appropriate time and that search materials are retained for the appropriate time per the Records Retention policy.
The chair of the search committee shall be responsible for the coordination of multiple reference checks of all semi-finalist candidates. In addition to contacting references provided by the applicant, other people who would have knowledge of the applicant's professional qualifications should be included. All questions asked and information gathered must be job-related.
After reference checks are completed and all information gained is shared with the committee, the semi-finalists are evaluated, and a list of finalists is forwarded to the department head for approval.
The task of search committees is to solicit applications from as wide a base as possible. It is especially important to seek strong candidates. In senior searches, the committee must actively identify and encourage potential applicants. It is not acceptable merely to advertise and wait for applications to arrive. Junior searches can rely more heavily on advertisements and applications, but it is still useful to make contacts to identify the top candidates.
An important part of identifying top candidates is to ask department faculty to think of and suggest names of candidates and contact colleagues and acquaintances to apply or seek nominations.
The search committee evaluates all applicants (with possible input from other members of the faculty at the department’s discretion as noted above), develops a list of semifinalists, and recommends them to the department head.
Search committee chairs must remind finalists, who are candidates for associate or full professor, to visit the Disclosure of Misconduct | Faculty Affairs (psu.edu) website and complete the Disclosure of Misconduct Form as soon as possible after they are notified that they are a finalist (i.e., invited for an on-campus interview). All finalists, regardless of whether they have an investigation to disclose, must complete the form. If finalists have any questions about the process, they may be directed to Abby Diehl, assistant vice provost for faculty affairs, at agc105@psu.edu.
Note that interviewers should be mindful of topics that should be avoided, as outlined in the materials from HR and Associate Dean for Educational Equity.
Note that the Dean will review and approve both the long and short lists (these can be submitted at the same time) with an eye to strength of the pools and may ask the department head about efforts made to generate these pools.
The dean will authorize campus visits of one or more candidates per position. If a department wants to invite more than three candidates, additional dean’s approval is required. The department head must provide the dean with a curricula vita for each potential finalist and the following information: the position for which the person is being considered and whether tenure is a possibility (if it is not obvious, i.e., as with a new Ph.D., on the one hand, or on the other hand, a distinguished senior scholar at a peer institution). No candidate should be invited to campus without the dean’s permission. Make certain that all potential interviewees have applied for the position in Workday.
At this stage of the search there is often a question about whether applicants who are NOT shortlisted can be notified that they are no longer under consideration. HR recommends that no candidate is contacted until an offer is accepted because we may have to go back to the pool for additional candidates at any time.
Campus visits by the finalists are arranged by the department. The chair of the search committee generally will act as host; staff support from the department will arrange transportation, accommodation, and the itinerary. The itinerary shall include, at least, meetings with the search committee, the department head, the department faculty and staff, students, and the dean. Senior candidates should be scheduled to meet with the associate dean for research and graduate studies as well as the dean. All candidates for the same position should be offered the same experiences while on campus. That means that if one is invited to a dinner at someone’s home, they all should be, or if they are taken to a restaurant, they all should be taken to a restaurant. It doesn’t have to be the same restaurant, of course, but something similar. See the document ‘Best Practices for Scheduling Interviews with the Dean(s) for Tenure-Line Faculty Searches’ for more information about scheduling interviews.
Meals: Meetings over meals with more than four people (three plus the candidate) in attendance will not be supported by university funds because of both cost and logistics—it is hard for a group of five or more to have a meaningful conversation. Any meal that is scheduled for more than four people must be approved in advance by the Financial Officer (FO). The cost of the meal must also be approved in advance by the FO if it is anticipated that the meal will cost more than $59 per person including alcoholic beverages (see below) and tip.
Alcoholic beverages: Faculty in departments without OGE funds must pay for their own alcoholic beverages at dinners with candidates. Departments with OGE funds should note that alcoholic beverages MAY be purchased but reimbursement will be limited to two alcoholic beverages and no more than $25 per person. There is no need to get a separate receipt for the alcohol.
Candidate spouses: All expenses for candidate spouses must be charged to OGE funds.
The search committee meets at the conclusion of all visits and prepares recommendations to the department head on each finalist. The recommendations to the department head (which will be communicated to the dean) should NOT be ranked. Each candidate should be noted as “not acceptable”, “acceptable”, or “exceptional”, with a list of strengths and weaknesses for each.
No offers may be extended without authorization from the dean. After all visits of candidates for a particular position are completed, the head should assess faculty opinion, consult with the search committee, and then make a judgment about which, if any, candidate should be offered a position. The head should then contact the dean through an email, phone call, or (in complicated cases) personal appointment. The department head should have an idea in mind about the kind of offer they would like to make, i.e., possible salary range and reasons for it, and other parts of a startup package. Work with the Department Administrator and Business Administrator to develop the startup package using the startup sheet template.
If the dean authorizes an offer, it is a good idea to call the candidate, outline the offer, and obtain a reading on the candidate’s receptivity to the offer. Unless the candidate immediately declines over the phone, verbal offers should always be followed with a Letter of Understanding from the Department Head and then an official offer letter from the Dean. You should provide a draft of the LOU to the Business Administrator who will review it and clear the substantive aspects with the dean. Please note that the LOU letter MUST include ALL items and amounts that have been negotiated with the candidate. Once the draft LOU is approved, the head should prepare it, sign it, and send it to the dean’s office for the dean’s signature. Once signed the dean’s office will return it to the head ready to be sent to the candidate.
Sometimes negotiations are complex. The head needs to stay in touch with the candidate, impose reasonable deadlines for a decision, and work with both the candidate and dean to bring about a favorable response.
Once the candidate decides, the head should inform the dean. Then, the official offer letter will be prepared by the HR Consultant and sent to the candidate on the dean’s behalf. The Business Administrator will then notify the appropriate people. The MRS and the HR Consultant will follow up later in the semester when appointment details need to be taken care of. If an immediate tenure process is necessary, the Business Administrator will send instructions to the department head and ask them to begin assembling the immediate tenure dossier. After the acceptance of an offer by a candidate, the department head or search committee chair will notify all unsuccessful interviewed finalists and thank them for their interest in Penn State via phone, letter, or email. Unsuccessful finalists should be notified by phone rather than by letter or email. All remaining candidates will be sent a system generated message from Workday Recruiting once the hiring action is finalized in Workday. All candidates who make campus visits should have their travel expense vouchers processed promptly.
If the search fails, it is the Search Committee Chair’s responsibility to inform the semi-finalists and finalists as soon as possible that the search has failed, and they are no longer under consideration. If the search is to be readvertised, inform semi-finalists and finalists of this and that they are welcome to reapply, if applicable. Please coordinate with EMS HR on the appropriate language to use in these notifications.
The MRS finalizes the offer process in Workday by processing the applicants who were interviewed but not hired and the reason for non-selection. Talent Acquisition closes the position in Workday Recruiting. This automatically generates a ‘your application was unsuccessful’ letter to those applicants who were NOT interviewed. All applicant data and correspondence related to the search must be retained and sent to the recruiter for the appropriate records retention period.
As with many tasks we perform in our college, faculty searches have certain confidentiality requirements that go beyond the normal day-to-day processes we have in place. To that end, and to ensure that our faculty position applicants are afforded the confidentiality they expect, EMS highly recommends we treat the following items in the manner described below. We should only be sharing the information about those we are bringing in for interviews:
The preceding paragraphs are guidelines that should serve in the search, selection, recruitment, and appointment of tenure-line faculty members for the College of EMS at Penn State. Any changes or deviations from these suggested procedures should be discussed with the Dean or their representative as early as possible in the search process.
Last updated: May 12, 2025
See also AC13 Procedure for Hiring Full-Time Faculty (formerly HR13): https://policy.psu.edu/policies/ac13
These guidelines are designed to assist EMS sub-units that are recruiting non-tenure-line faculty. Our desire is to have collegial, open searches that aggressively identify and seek a diversity of excellent candidates to appoint outstanding new faculty. Thus, searches are a vital part of maintaining the College’s excellence.
The search process begins when the sub-unit head requests permission from the dean to search. If approved by the dean, they will authorize a search in a particular field or fields and at a specific rank, or as an open search. The job ad is then reviewed by the HR Consultant who works with the dean for final approval. After approval, the HR Consultant works with the sub-unit to submit the job requisition in Workday. Talent Acquisition posts the ad on Penn State’s Career Page and submits the request for external advertising sites. The final advertisement is sent to the sub-unit for approval.
The search committee, in consultation with the sub-unit head, normally prepares the job description. Recruiting guidelines will be made available to the search committee. (Advertising in national venues is optional for non-tenure-line faculty appointments.) The ad should clearly indicate the nature of the duties, and the background of education and experience sought. Ordinarily, it will list a set of minimum essential qualifications and expectations of the position. If considering faculty members who require visa sponsorship, work closely with EMS HR and Global on required items in job posting. The position description should also discuss expectations for the position in supporting and fostering department and EMS priorities. Additionally, a statement along the lines of “Please note: Applicant materials may be shared beyond the search committee.”
The complete approved ad from Talent Acquisition must be used for all position announcements (advertisements, list-servs, e-mails, etc.). All jobs must be posted for 30 days so that if an international candidate is selected, we meet those requirements for sponsorship. Offers cannot be made until the 31st day.
The sub-unit head normally appoints the search committee. The committee must have a minimum of five members. No fewer than half of the members on a search committee will be faculty members of the academic unit in which the new faculty member will be appointed, or those who hold joint appointments with the academic unit. All search committees should represent a broad range of members. With the Dean’s approval (and in exceptional circumstances), the sub-unit head may serve on the committee.
Sub-unit heads play a key role in any search. They must stay in touch with the search committee chair and help in motivating sub-unit faculty to provide names of appropriate candidates. The head will lead the sub-unit discussion of candidates brought forward by the search committee and will then make a recommendation about who should be invited for a campus visit. The sub-unit head will ensure that the search chair attends/reviews the Faculty Search Training (when available) along with the committee members; shares and discusses the HR search information with the committee; and invites the Associate Dean for Educational Equity (or their delegate) to meet with the committee; all prior to completing and posting the job description.
Search committee chairs are expected to take the lead in contacting potential candidates, keeping the sub-unit head informed about the progress of the search and communicating with other sub-unit faculty about the search.
The Chair must ensure that each search committee member reviews the University’s Faculty Search Training prior to developing the job description for the job posting.
The chair of the committee or sub-unit head appoints a staff person (typically, they are given the Manager Recruiting Support (MRS) role in Workday) in the unit to be responsible for the coordination of the advertising process and the search. Workday Recruiting must be used for all searches. The MRS or our Talent Acquisition Recruiter gives the chair and members of the search committee access to the search in Workday and monitors, verifies, acknowledges, and maintains materials submitted by applicants. At the direction of the sub-unit head or search committee chair, the MRS may also be responsible for scheduling search committee meetings and drafting correspondence regarding applicants for the chair's signature. At the sub-unit’s discretion, certain application materials may also be made available to other members of the faculty (and staff and/or postdoctoral scholars) for them to provide input to the search committee (please see breakout of recommended items below). These faculty members should be reminded that application materials are to be treated with confidentiality and discussed at the sub-unit level only. Faculty members must not be in contact with applicants or colleagues of applicants.
See SHARING OF APPLICANT MATERIALS below for EMS standards regarding the sharing of candidate materials.
Use of Workday Recruiting is required to ensure that applicants receive the required disclosure statements at the appropriate time and that search materials are retained for the appropriate time per the Records Retention policy.
The chair of the search committee shall be responsible for the coordination of multiple reference checks of all semi-finalist candidates. In addition to contacting references provided by the applicant, other people who would have knowledge of the applicant's professional qualifications should be included. All questions asked and information gathered must be job-related.
After reference checks are completed and all information gained is shared with the committee, the semifinalists are evaluated, and a list of finalists is forwarded to the sub-unit head for approval.
The task of search committees is to solicit applications from as wide a base as possible.
With the announcement in early 2025 about some Penn State Commonwealth Campuses closing, there has been a slight change to the process of posting and reviewing candidates. The campuses designated for closure are Dubois, Fayette, Mont Alto, New Kensington, Shenango, Wilkes-Barre, and York.
When filling an NTL faculty position, search committees must follow these steps:
It is especially important to seek strong candidates from underrepresented groups. In recruiting members of underrepresented groups, the committee must actively identify and encourage potential applicants. It is not acceptable merely to advertise and wait for applications to arrive. Junior searches can rely more heavily on advertisements and applications, but it is still useful to make contacts to identify the top candidates.
An important part of identifying top candidates is to ask sub-unit faculty to think of and suggest names of candidates and contact colleagues and acquaintances to apply or seek nominations.
The search committee evaluates all applicants (with possible input from other members of the faculty at the sub-unit’s discretion as noted above), develops a list of semifinalists, and recommends them to the sub-unit head.
Note that interviewers should be mindful of topics that should be avoided, as outlined in the materials from HR and Associate Dean for Educational Equity.
The sub-unit head will authorize campus visits of one or more candidates per position. If a sub-unit wants to invite more than three candidates, additional approval is required. Make certain that all potential interviewees have applied for the position in Workday.
At this stage of the search there is often a question about whether applicants who are NOT shortlisted can be notified that they are no longer under consideration. HR recommends that no candidate is contacted until an offer is accepted because we may have to go back to the pool for additional candidates at any time.
Campus visits by the finalists are arranged by the sub-unit. The chair of the search committee generally will act as host; staff support from the sub-unit will arrange transportation, accommodation, and the itinerary. The itinerary shall include, at minimum, meetings with the search committee, the sub-unit head, the sub-unit faculty and staff, and students. All candidates for the same position should be offered the same experiences while on campus. That means that if one is invited to a dinner at someone’s home, they all should be, or if they are taken to a restaurant, they all should be taken to a restaurant. It doesn’t have to be the same restaurant, of course, but something similar.
Meals: Meetings over meals with more than four people (three plus the candidate) in attendance will not be supported by university funds because of both cost and logistics—it is hard for a group of five or more to have a meaningful conversation. Any meal that is scheduled for more than four people must be approved in advance by the Financial Officer (FO). The cost of the meal must also be approved in advance by the FO if it is anticipated that the meal will cost more than $59 per person including alcoholic beverages (see below) and tip.
Alcoholic beverages: Faculty in sub-unit without OGE funds must pay for their own alcoholic beverages at dinners with candidates. Sub-units with OGE funds should note that alcoholic beverages MAY be purchased but reimbursement will be limited to two alcoholic beverages and no more than $25 per person. There is no need to get a separate receipt for the alcohol.
Candidate spouses: All expenses for candidate spouses must be charged to OGE funds.
The search committee meets at the conclusion of all visits and prepares recommendations to the sub-unit head on each finalist. The recommendations to the sub-unit head should NOT be ranked. Each candidate should be noted as “not acceptable”, “acceptable”, or “exceptional”, with a list of strengths and weaknesses for each.
No offers may be extended without authorization from the sub-unit head. After all visits of candidates for a particular position are completed, the head should assess faculty opinion, consult with the search committee, and then make a judgment about which, if any, candidate should be offered a position. The sub-unit head should then contact the successful candidate. The sub-unit head should have an idea in mind the kind of offer they would like to make, i.e., possible salary range and reasons for it, and other parts of a startup package. Work with the sub-unit administrator to develop the offer.
It is a good idea to call the candidate, outline the offer, and obtain a reading on the candidate’s receptivity to the offer. Unless the candidate immediately declines over the phone, verbal offers should always be followed with an official offer letter from the sub-unit head.
Sometimes negotiations are complex. The head needs to stay in touch with the candidate, impose reasonable deadlines for a decision, and work with the candidate to bring about a favorable response.
Once the candidate decides, the sub-unit head should inform their Administrative Coordinator. Then, the official offer letter will be prepared by the HR Consultant and sent to the candidate on the sub-unit head’s behalf. The MRS and the HR Consultant will follow up later in the semester when appointment details need to be taken care of. After the acceptance of an offer by a candidate, the sub-unit head or search committee chair will notify all unsuccessful, interviewed finalists and thank them for their interest in Penn State via phone, letter, or email. Unsuccessful finalists should be notified by phone rather than by letter or email. All remaining candidates will be sent a system generated message from Workday Recruiting once the hiring action is finalized in Workday. All candidates who make campus visits should have their travel expense vouchers processed promptly.
If the search fails, it is the Search Committee Chair’s responsibility to inform the semi-finalists and finalists as soon as possible that the search has failed, and they are no longer under consideration. If the search is to be readvertised, inform semi-finalists and finalists of this and that they are welcome to reapply, if applicable. Please coordinate with EMS HR on the appropriate language to use in these notifications.
The MRS finalizes the offer process in Workday by processing the applicants who were interviewed but not hired and the reason for non-selection. Talent Acquisition closes the position in Workday Recruiting. This automatically generates a ‘your application was unsuccessful’ letter to those applicants who were NOT interviewed. All applicant data and correspondence related to the search must be retained and sent to the recruiter for the appropriate records retention period.
As with many tasks we perform in our college, faculty searches have certain confidentiality requirements that go beyond the normal day-to-day processes we have in place. To that end, and to ensure that our faculty position applicants are afforded the confidentiality they expect, EMS highly recommends we treat the following items in the manner described below. We should only be sharing the information about those we are bringing in for interviews:
The preceding paragraphs are guidelines that should serve in the search, selection, recruitment, and appointment of non-tenure-line faculty members for the College of EMS at Penn State. Any changes or deviations from these suggested procedures should be discussed with the Dean or their representative as early as possible in the search process.
Last updated: August 27, 2025
As part of our regular “We Are!” feature, we recognize 20 Penn Staters who have gone above and beyond what’s asked of them in their work at the University.
Registration is now open for the John and Willie Leone Family Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering’s annual "MINING ROCKS!" summer camp. The camp will be held on Penn State's University Park Campus on July 12–17. Coordinated by the Mining Engineering program, the five-day camp is designed for 20 high school students between the 10th and 12th grades to provide firsthand lab experience with mining technology and even includes a visit to a local mining company and quarry.
Metin Çakır, the Austin A. Dowell Professor of Applied Economics at the University of Minnesota, will give the talk, “California Drought, Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Prices, and Consumer Welfare,” at noon on Wednesday, April 29, in 157 Hosler Building at Penn State University Park. The event is part of a spring seminar series hosted by the Initiative for Energy and Environmental Economics and Policy (EEEPI). Talk is free and open to the public.
As he prepares to graduate in May, James Rowley is completing an honors thesis focused on one of the most remote and rapidly changing places on Earth: Antarctica. A Penn State Schreyer Honors Scholar majoring in geography and economics with a certificate in geographic information science, Rowley is studying uncertainty in satellite estimates of Antarctic surface hydrology as an undergraduate research assistant in Penn State’s Cryosphere and Climate Lab, led by Luke Trusel, associate professor of geography.
Sophia White, a sophomore majoring in geosciences, said she was drawn to Penn State because of her interest in the world around her, especially how the field of geosciences could better help scientists understand the interplay between land, water and life.